Over 90% of cases settle, though it could take months or even years before settlement discussions become serious for all parties involved. There are methods to help legal teams expedite these discussions, and one of our renowned experts has pioneered a process using game theory that achieves just that.
On a recent episode of Round Table Group’s podcast, Engaging Experts, we spoke with a forward-thinking expert, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. Bruce is an Emeritus Senior Fellow with the Hoover Institution, and the Silver Professor of Politics at New York University. Using game theory, Bruce helps legal teams figure out what a likely settlement agreement will look like and how to change that amount by making it higher or lower based on several techniques, arguments, persuasion, and other skills.
As Bruce explains, “Applied game theory is a way of understanding how people deal with each other strategically, considering what they believe the other person is going to do if they make this choice, that choice, or a different action. It is playing multidimensional chess.”
When legal teams enact Bruce’s dynamic model during litigation, it illuminates the potential actions that the opposing party will take and what will make them take an action that is ideal for you and your client. Bruce has computerized this process over the last 30 years. There are essential questions that inform the outcome, and if the answers to these questions are understood, Bruce can determine what everyone will do and agree to with more than 90% accuracy. This then makes it probable that an attorney can influence the opposition to agree to an outcome that is closer to what they want than what the other side wants.
Bruce’s model has been used on several occasions, and on average it produces 25 to 40% better settlement terms than the client expected. In fact, the CIA conducted a study that found that Bruce’s predictions for the computer model hit the bullseye twice as often as their own analysts’ predictions.
As negotiations evolve over time, Bruce’s model allows for the input of new metrics, meaning that it is dynamic. Bruce explains, “It is not just constantly updating the information, the model has already projected step by step how the process will unfold and gives you insights into when we should stop talking and take this deal, because it is going to head in a bad direction, perhaps in the future, or it is getting better, and we should keep talking. There are times when new things are learned, where there is a realization that you need to make some change to the inputs because there’s been an external shock, which has changed the trajectory.”
Bruce’s story is a fascinating one, and his use of game theory in settlement discussions has transformed how litigators approach this common stage of litigation. We were delighted to speak with him in detail on his work with litigators and how legal teams can improve the odds of successful negotiations. You can find the episode in its entirety, and listen to all other episodes of the Engaging Experts podcast here.
For more than 25 years, Round Table Group has helped litigators to locate, evaluate, and employ the best and most qualified expert witnesses. Round Table Group is a great complement to any litigator’s quest for an expert witness and our search is always free of charge. Visit roundtablegroup.com or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.
Our analysis expert witnesses, speakers, and consultants have expertise in a broad spectrum of disciplines including mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics, management, chemistry, polymer physics, mechanical and aerospace engineering, environmental toxicology, anthropology, sociology, linguistics, medicine, law, and more. Our analysis experts have successfully testified for both plaintiffs and defense in a variety of cases.
Game theorists study mathematical models of the interaction between rational decision-makers. Game theory can be applied within multiple fields including system science, computer science, and logic. It can also be used as a term that describes logical decision making in computers, humans, and animals.
Negotiation is the bargaining process between two or more parties. Each side has their own requirement, goals, and perspectives. They seek to find common ground, reach an agreement, settle a problem that affects both sides, or settle a conflict. Through the negotiating process, the parties try to avoid arguing and reach a compromise.