Depends who you ask. But 71% of corporate counsels, and 61% of private practice lawyers agree that pricing and fees is the #1 issue facing the legal industry, according to the recent Lex/Nex survey. Undoubtedly fodder for a blogosphere feeding frenzy, this commissioned survey also shows that most (77%) private practice lawyers believe their clients are too focused on cost.

The impact of these, and other noted trends, has a serious impact on the expert witness industry.

This question is usually asked with some apprehension from new expert witnesses. The key is clearly preparation and caution. Early work and preparation with your client is critical. Aaron Larson, a lawyer based out of Michigan, wrote a very useful series of tips for the new expert witness.Part of it includes:

If you are inexperienced  as an expert witness, you should know the following for deposition:

Know the legal issues. Speak with your client about the legal issues, and get comfortable with the legal terminology for your case.

Only one person may speak at a time. Everything you say at a deposition is being transcribed. The court reporter cannot make a good record when people interrupt each other or talk at the same time.

Only answer the question that was asked. Ordinarily, after you have answered the specific question that you were asked, you will not want to volunteer any additional information. Even if opposing counsel sits silently and seems to expect you to say more, don't fall into that trap. If opposing counsel wants more information, he will ask a follow-up question. Get used to silence even if it makes you uncomfortable -- it is your job to answer questions, not to fill silence.

Think before you answer questions. Whether on direct examination or cross-examination, think before you speak. It is almost always better for there to be a short pause before you answer a question than for you to give a bad answer.



His whole posting with many more great suggesitons can be found here 

Many of our experts we place with clients are new to the experience, and have never testified or given a deposition before. Given that many a deposition will be in a hostile, or at least oppositional manner, preparation is critical.

One of the most common questions I get is: "What should I expect?"

Well, every deposition will be different, but as a starting place to prepare, here are five good questions you ought to be able to answer, as posted in the Trial Lawyers Resource Center web page.

Who engaged you on this case?
What did the ask you to do?
What did you actually do?
What conclusion and opinions did you reach, and what do you intend to testify to at trial?
Were there any other test - analysis or things you could have done that you would have liked to? What were they?

Clearly, there will be case-specific issues as well, but these are a good indication of what an opposing attorney might ask you.  

Another good suggestion they have is to draft the 10 most critical questions that the opposition may ask.  Ask yourself how to answer these questions, or better yet, have your client or a colleague ask them, perhaps even in a confrontational way.

While I am a big fan of market forces determining an expert's billing rates, there has been an interesting ruling recently that has led me to re-think this philosophy, at least in specific situations. In this matter, one party (plaintiff) hired a neurosurgeon expert at a staggering 5000.00 for the first hour, 2,000 an hour thereafter, which of course is their right. If they want to pay an expert that amount, well, good for them. But when the opposing party (defendant) has to pay for the expert's time in a deposition, they got stuck with that rate as well. Is this fair?

In her Dec. 30 ruling, (Crawford v. American Legion Ambulance Association) a New Jersey federal magistrate judge thinks its not, calling $7,000 for two hours work "near to being extortionate".

Check out the whole story here.

Not all of our experts we place with clients are bound for the Supreme Court. They are not destined to appear on Fox News. They are not thrust into the high profile cases for fame and glory. They, like the vast majority of our country's justice system, are found in the small towns and cities of our nation, away from the glare of TV cameras and reporters. Our experts bring their insight, wisdom, and experience to where ever it is needed most. Justice has no ambition, other than to be comprehensibly available, and universally applied. That's why I love this quote from Eleanor Roosevelt.

"Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home - so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world ... Such are the places where every man, woman and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere."
-- Eleanor Roosevelt

"What litigation trends should I expect from 2010?" one of my favorite-to-work-with experts asked me a couple of week back. Its was a question I had been hearing a lot lately, and I had been asking it almost as often. Here is what I see as some of the trends in the expert witness industry.

For 2010, I see three major trends in the expert witness industry: Earlier identification and retaining of experts,  increased sensitivity to cost by clients, and an increased amount of litigation in environmental damages, financial misconduct, and in the area of labor and employment. What does this mean for expert witnesses?

First, there will be a greater amount of time between the search/identification/interviewing/retaining of experts by clients on the one hand, and the actual start date of experts, on the other. Experts will need to be able to work within a longer time frame, requiring careful expert-client coordination on invoicing.

Second, and we saw this more and more last year, Clients will be much more cost-sensitive, requesting budgets from experts, relying more on video conferencing and other cost saving measures, and taking a harder line on negotiating rates. Experts who include this cost sensitivity in to their marketing and presentations will have an advantage over their competitors.

Finally, based on industry reports and expert observations, we expect to see an increased demand for expert witnesses in many areas of litigation, perhaps particularly in environmental damages matters, in employment and labor disputes, as well as in continued (and increasingly broad) litigation from the fall-out of the financial collapse of 2008-09.

Table Group Group membership can help you take full advantage of the latest industry trends, with profile reviews, links to conferences, and marketing ideas. Just reach out to our skilled expert services coordinators, who are standing by to assist.