|
|
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Bank of America, defending a suit by the SEC alleging that it misled investors prior to its acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co., could not introduce expert witness testimony at trial detailing media reports predicting it would pay bonuses. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff found that Bank of America's argument that shareholders already knew that Merrill would likely pay billions of dollars in bonuses based on widespread media reports was not credible because the bank's own proxy statement told shareholders to ignore such reports.
Categories
Expert Witness News
Tags
expert witness testimony
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this post: Expert Witness Testimony Limited in Banking Case
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.roundtablegroup.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/312